I honestly cannot deal with too much stuff right now because I just lost my grandad, and I've got a research council deadline from hell to attend to. In short, I'm crazy busy. I can tell my sister that I'm busy. But to a severely isolated individual it can sound like an excuse, no matter how true it is. Blame it on my crap communication and obvious lack of Christian love, that's still only one part of the story: there's the message sent and there is the message received. To people who have been rejected all their lives, my occasionally being busy sounds like yet another rejection. I learned it the hard way, as I mentionned in the comments on one of poseroprophet's posts.
This is also the reason why I chose to re-post this very important message a couple of weeks ago: vulnerable people can be EXTREMELY sensitive to the slightest criticism on their behaviour or to shifts in your level of interest. Some of your friends may have broad shoulders, they can take a bit of shit and it doesn't matter (I love such friends, thank the Lord for them!). But someone who hasn't had a friend for the last 10 years often does not have such broad shoulders at all, so thread carefully: you're gonna have to be the one with the shoulders. This is especially true if you're not interacting within a structure in which there is some continuity. But even if you are within such a structure, some people are so insecure and transcient that they might never be seen there again if you fuck up.
Never overextend yourselves and hurt people in the process. Friendly indifference is a hell of a lot better than rushed best-friend-ness. Hell, I feel like going on a one girl crusade for friendly indifference, because friendly indifference is a fertile ground for organically grown friendships: the ones in which trust has the time to develop incrementally. I'll discuss incrementalism in my next post, I told you I had stuff to say.
3 comments:
Actually 'friendly indifference' (if there is such a thing -- perhaps 'polite indifference' would be a better term) and 'rushed best-friend-ness' are both shitty options. They both strike me as self-absorbed, and rather bourgeois -- a far cry from the type of relationality that I see us called to as Christians.
I'm finding myself reliant on you to define the third option, to give people a flavour of what it looks like. Because, in all honestly, it's outside of my box and I cannot imagine it. How do you relate meaningfully to a lot of people?
I maintain that friendly indifference is not the same as polite indifference, but I guess that now the onus is on me to define it.
Finally, friendly indifference is at best a beginning, and it should not be an end.
I think there are some people who are better at making many friends. I am not one of them unfortunately. It's very hard for to me maintain many relationships and do justice to all of them. One has to know one's limits. People can tell if my smile is genuine or fake. That's why I try not to put myself in situations that would require me to be friends with many and on different levels. We are all gifted differently...
And, you are right about vulnerable people...
Post a Comment